medusabraids:

sexiest moments in marvel movies

1. the bit where thor unlocks his powers near the end of thor ragnarok and the immigrant song starts playing in the background

2. the bit in winter soldier where bucky moves out of the way of that car

3. ‘would you kill me my love?’ ‘for wakanda? without question’

Stonewall Book Award 2018 speech

brandycolbert:

Hi! It’s been a long time since I’ve been on Tumblr, so thanks if you’re still following me!

Today is the paperback release of my second book, Little & Lion (how beautiful is that new cover?), and since a few people have asked about my Stonewall speech, this seemed like the perfect time to post it! I forgot to have someone record it, so you don’t get to see me cry, but I’m posting the text below. Thanks for reading!

It is such an honor to be here. Thank you to the Stonewall committee for this award, which is such a highlight of my life and career.

People often ask why authors write the books that we do, and the answers always vary. I wrote this book for several reasons, but I asked myself a few times why I was writing a queer character when I myself do not identify on the LGBTQ spectrum.

I was born and raised in Springfield, Missouri, a conservative town in a conservative state with a population that is overwhelmingly white, Republican, and Christian. I was raised in one of the few black families in our town; I’ve written and talked about the history of racism in Springfield, but suffice to say I was no stranger to the intolerance that wove its way through the southwest pocket of the state. Most places I went, I was seen as “different”—constantly reminded of my darker skin and tightly curled hair.

The first time I remember seeing someone “different” from me was when I met a girl named Kathy Z in first grade. Kathy was a sweet girl with white-blond hair and a gap between her two front teeth. She was also born with a congenital hand deformity. When I went home that day, I immediately asked my parents about Kathy’s hand. I wanted to know if it was okay to hold her hand at recess like the rest of the girls and I did. My parents exchanged a glance before they told me that her difference didn’t mean anything other than that—her hand was different from mine.

My parents made it very clear that “different” wasn’t synonymous with bad. And they told me plainly that I wasn’t better than anyone else, and that was no one was better than me. I’ve never forgotten that.

But it also became clear from a pretty early age that most people in our town didn’t think that way. I grew up fielding assumptions based on my skin color from people who didn’t know me, and from people who should have known better. And I wasn’t the only one.

Queerness wasn’t something that was accepted or openly discussed where I grew up. Homosexuality wasn’t decriminalized in Missouri until 2003, when the Supreme Court case Lawrence v. Texas invalidated sodomy laws in the remaining fourteen states that upheld them. Conversion therapy is still legal in Missouri, and one of the current US senators from the state proudly voted against marriage equality.

This is the environment I grew up in. It is the sort of environment that likes to constantly remind you of what you are if you are not straight, cisgender, white, and able-bodied.

I don’t recall the first time I recognized queerness, but I watched a lot of television as a small child in the ’80s, MTV in particular, so I’m pretty sure it was George Michael in the video for “Wake Me Up Before You Go Go.” I also went to a black Baptist church every Sunday, and it was there that I learned queerness was considered a sin in the Bible. That never sat right with me, even before I was old enough to truly understand what it meant. There were not-so-quiet rumors swirling through the church about the man who played piano for the gospel and youth choirs. He brought such joy to the congregation each week with his music, but even if he hadn’t, I didn’t understand how he could be more of a sinner than everyone else simply because of whom he loved.

I worked at a hardware store throughout high school and college, and one of my favorite coworkers was a man named Kyle. He was funny, charming, and the first openly gay person I’d ever known. I was eighteen years old. We became fast friends, and, shortly after, his boyfriend, Fred, began working there. They were eventually married in a civil union that was, of course, unrecognized by the state of Missouri in the late 1990s. For years, I was the only black person to work in our store of more than two hundred employees, and Fred and Kyle were the only openly queer people there. I always felt a camaraderie with them. Maybe it was because we were all considered “different” in our small town and in that big store. Maybe it was because no matter how “different” the three of us were, we always demanded respect from our coworkers and customers, and in most cases, we received it.

I continued to live in Springfield throughout college, and less than a month after graduating with a journalism degree, I packed up my things and moved across the country to Los Angeles. In Little & Lion, Suzette is sure that she witnesses Lionel falling in love at first sight with her crush Rafaela. I am certain if someone had captured the look on my face when my U-Haul touched down in Los Angeles, they would have seen that same expression.

I was instantly smitten with L.A. Of course the weather was perpetually gorgeous, the city was surrounded by beaches and mountains, and sixteen years later, I still can’t get over the palm trees. But what struck me the most was how everyone in Los Angeles was allowed to just be. There were people all different shades of brown, speaking different languages and not drawing strange looks because of it. There was a neighborhood predominantly populated by Orthodox Jews, and there was Boyle Heights, Chinatown, Little Tokyo, Koreatown, and Leimert Park, all ethnic neighborhoods celebrating long histories of strong cultural identity. My mouth dropped open the first time I spotted a police car in the city of West Hollywood. I couldn’t believe what I was seeing: Their cruisers all have rainbow flags emblazoned on the side. Los Angeles felt so good to me because you didn’t stand out for being different—everyone was different, and those differences were celebrated.

I’ve heard that some readers believe Little & Lion is “too diverse.” I write to reflect the world around me, and my world in Los Angeles is incredibly diverse and rich with various cultures. To imply that a story is unbelievable because it depicts a bisexual Jewish black girl falling for a pansexual Latina and a half-Korean half-black boy is insulting to the very people living those lives.

I was once a little black girl in a very white town, dying to read about someone who looked like me. To validate my existence. I was in college before I saw myself in books, and it instantly made me feel less alone. As an author, it is a privilege to write books that can serve as a mirror. But Suzette is not me. I have, sometimes to my great consternation, always been a bit “boy crazy.” I don’t know what it’s like to be a bisexual girl, and I was worried I’d overstepped my bounds in writing her story, despite the work I put into making her experience read as authentically as possible. I can empathize through my experiences living with racism, but I’m well aware they aren’t the same experience.

By the time the Stonewall committee called to share the good news earlier this year, I’d convinced myself that I should not have written this book. I don’t think anyone was more shocked than me, though, when statistics were released on the number of books published with black girl protagonists written by black women in 2017. The numbers were bleak, but even bleaker was the fact that Little & Lion was the only one of those books to feature LGBTQ content.

It’s my wish that in the very near future, there are so many books about queer black girls—hopefully written by queer black authors—that we don’t have to count them. And it is my lifelong hope that we remember to love and respect each other, and continue to celebrate everyone’s differences and identities. I truly cannot wait for the day that “diversity” isn’t a buzzword or an initiative, and when inclusivity is an integral part of publishing and the world.

I am extremely honored to receive this recognition for Suzette’s story, particularly during LGBTQ Pride month. Thank you to the Stonewall Award committee for recognizing my work, especially in a year that saw so many beautiful, groundbreaking books published about teens spanning the LGBTQ spectrum. I am so grateful to my editors, Alvina Ling and Kheryn Callender, who gave me the smart and honest feedback I needed to make Little & Lion the book it is today. And I would not be standing here without the incredible support and love of my agent, Tina Dubois, who championed this book in its early stages and encouraged me to write what was in my heart.

Thank you for awarding my work.

serakosumosu:

teenagecriminalmastermind:

inkskinned:

i have thought a lot about censorship and what is “appropriate”. not a lot of people know this, but lolita was written to show what we allow on our bookshelves: there being no swear words in it meant it was free from censorship. a book about child molestation was allowed because it didn’t explicitly use the word “fuck”. he wrote it to show we don’t really care about protecting children, and it ended up being seen as a romance.

someone once told me – actually, many people have – that lgbt content isn’t appropriate for children. any content. not just kissing. i’m drowned in questions: “won’t the parents have to explain it?” “kids shouldn’t be thinking about sex at this age, or do you think differently?” “what will the kids think?”

at six i saw disney movies. people kiss and get married. i didn’t ask “what does that mean.” i didn’t ask “are those people going to have sex?” i didn’t ask anything, because i was six, and no six year old thinks twice about these things. nobody ever “explained” being straight to me, it was a fact, and it existed, and i was fine with that. why would being gay require a thesis, i wonder.

someone once told me that the one of the reasons people hate lgbt individuals is because they can’t see us as anything but sexual. we’re not people, so much as sinners. that they don’t see love, they see sex. just sex. it’s perversion, not a matter of the heart. only of the body.

i think i was in my early twenties before i saw someone like me. 

how old were you, though, before you saw violence? before you saw sexual assault on tv? i think something like that is only pg-13, and if it’s implied, they can get away with anything. i remember watching things and learning about blood, but knowing sex – sex was what was really wrong. sex was always rated r. sex was always kind of a bad word. i was told a lot that i wasn’t ready.

i had a dream last night that i made a site where people could ask any question they wanted about sex and get answered by a professional. it was shut down in moments because 15 year olds wanted to know if it should hurt, if “double-bagging” was a real thing, if this, if that. we shudder. don’t let the children know about that! 

but at thirteen i had seen enough violence it no longer struck me. i couldn’t say “fuck” but i knew that if you break your femur, you can bleed out internally in under half an hour. in school i wasn’t allowed to write about loving girls because what would the administration think – but i could write about wanting to kill myself and people would say how lovely, how blistering.

i have thought a lot about censorship. sometimes people on this site try it with me: don’t write this, don’t be so nasty. some of it is intrinsic. we know as people with a uterus not to complain about “that time of the month”, we know better than to talk about sexual assault (how shameful), we know that talking about a vagina is somehow scandalous. i can say “dick” and nobody questions me. some people only refer to the bottom half of me by “pussy”. they won’t wrap a mouth around “vagina” like it’s poison to them. even discussing this, that the language halts, that there’s an intrinsic desire to say “girls” instead of “women” – feels naughty, illicit. not for children.

the other day someone suggested i make my blog 18+. i said, okay, it deals a lot with depression and other problems that might be for a mature audience. oh no, they said, that’s not it, i think that’s helpful. i said, okay. so what is it then. well, you’re gay. you write about loving women. and i said, i don’t write about sex often and they said. it’s not about the sex. but wlw isn’t for a general audience. teenagers aren’t ready.

oh.

lolita is recommended for high school and up. i think about that a lot. i know girls who love it, who say it speaks to them on a deep level. it’s beautiful prose, after all. that was the whole point of the novel. something that looked like a rose but was intrinsically awful. i think about how if i was a model they’d want me to look young, thin, prepubescent. how my body would be sold and how through the mall i walk by images of barely-clothed women while mothers cannot breastfeed in public without fear of retribution. 

i think about how i can write a novel about violence and it will be pg-13 but if my characters say “fuck” twice it’s inappropriate. i said fuck three times so far in this post, which makes it only appropriate for adults. 

i think about that, and how my identity is something that people suggest lines up with a swear word. that people shouldn’t talk about it. that it’s a vulgarity. bad for children, harsh, confusing.

fuck. i love women. which one makes this only for those over eighteen.

This is such a powerful post. Read it fully, and spread it around.

@deadcatwithaflamethrower

Not sure how true the bit about the reasons behind Lolita are. I’ve never read it as it squicks me. However, someone else noticed the type of website op mentions exists and I wanted to make sure the link was included with the post:

http://www.scarleteen.com

biandlesbianliterature:

[image description: a photo of the movie cover of The Miseducation of Cameron Post by emily m. danforth against a rainbow background. There is another copy underneath, with the page edges facing out. The page edges are rainbow! The second image is a tweet from @penguinplatform that reads “The special edition of The Miseducation of Cameron post has landed! It’s a stunning book with equally stunning sprayed rainbow edges. #PrideBookClub

Get it here: Waterstones http://po.st/CameronWaterstones … or Amazon http://po.st/CameronRainbow

“]

This looks really gorgeous. Looks like QBD has it listed in their online store, for Australians who don’t want to give money to Amazon during the strike/boycott, or, y’know, ever.